Title
RIP Jan Nekovar
How to end the reign of the top 5? 1 2 3 4
How did Brian Conrad get fooled by AMM?
Riemann 1 2 ... 11 12 13
Analysis
UK AP salary question
What is Vladimir Drinfeld like?
Rejoice, category theory trolls
Mathematics as an outlet for intellectual narcissism
Best math departments in Germany?
Top 10 Generalist Math Journals 1 2
Endorsement of papers in journals (in particular, “top” ones) 1 2
Most inspiring book or paper you've read? 1 2
The Chow ring?
How does one gain political power in math community 1 2
Updates on Greenfeld-Tao Counterexample to Periodic Tiling Conjecture 1 2 3
Oldie but a goldie 1 2
US vs Europe jobs 1 2
Teaching high school math
Brian Conrad
The nLab. 1 2
Nonstandard analysis
Why is there no calculus in Newton’s Principia?
Sati-Schreiber Hypothesis H 1 2
David. H Yang stan thread 1 2
Would you rather give a Beamer or write on iPad talk?
Books with algebraic geometry examples 1 2
Look at your cv and find your best work: in which journal was it published? 1 2 3
Center for Quantum and Topological Systems
To UC people: Fix your stupid rec letter system 1 2
Is it good to have an ERC grant in math?
Tenure track job application results 1 2 ... 7 8 9
Why is there elitism against combinatorics, and for algebraic geometry? 1 2 3
Why do physicists blame Math? They say physics is Lost in Math.
Official Loop Quantum Gravity hate thread
Applying to be Peter Woit’s grad student… advice?
What the hell is this website? 1 2 3 4
Official Peter Woit blog hate thread 1 2 3 4 5
Who are the administrators of this site?
Why does the UK mathematics get a lot of grants? 1 2

Official Peter Woit blog hate thread

  1. Top Mathematician
    dsoy

    Do your best

    2 weeks dsoy
    Quote 0 Up 2 Down Report
  2. Top Mathematician
    ddjz

    I don't think his blog merits a hate thread. Gil Kalai's blog has enough things about it that makes you go "f this bs", but Woit's blog is just... meh.

    2 weeks ddjz
    Quote 2 Up 1 Down Report
  3. Top Mathematician
    dsoy

    I don't think his blog merits a hate thread. Gil Kalai's blog has enough things about it that makes you go "f this bs", but Woit's blog is just... meh.

    OK agreed. Thread canceled.

    2 weeks dsoy
    Quote 1 Up 0 Down Report
  4. Top Mathematician
    vfcz

    I don't know why he keeps on hating Shinichi Mochizuki given the fact that he couldn't understand any arithmetric geometry. He reminds me of those Math Education Research maniacs who kept saying "but the studies show blah blah blah." In his case, it was more of like "but Peter Scholze said blah blah blah."

    2 weeks vfcz
    Quote 5 Up 5 Down Report
  5. Top Mathematician
    ddjz

    I don't think his blog merits a hate thread. Gil Kalai's blog has enough things about it that makes you go "f this bs", but Woit's blog is just... meh.

    OK agreed. Thread canceled.

    This will cheer a lot of people up during difficult times.

    2 weeks ddjz
    Quote 3 Up 0 Down Report
  6. Top Mathematician
    cute

    In fact this could become an Ivan Fesenko appreciation thread and we don't want that.

    2 weeks cute
    Quote 0 Up 0 Down Report
  7. Top Mathematician
    ddjz

    In fact this could become an Ivan Fesenko appreciation thread and we don't want that.

    You're cute, and I mean it literally

    2 weeks ddjz
    Quote 2 Up 0 Down Report
  8. Top Mathematician
    pbej

    I don't know why he keeps on hating Shinichi Mochizuki given the fact that he couldn't understand any arithmetric geometry. He reminds me of those Math Education Research maniacs who kept saying "but the studies show blah blah blah." In his case, it was more of like "but Peter Scholze said blah blah blah."

    Good point but bizarre comparison

    2 weeks pbej
    Quote 4 Up 0 Down Report
  9. Top Mathematician
    cute

    On an unrelated note what kind of maniac runs his own discord server???

    2 weeks cute
    Quote 1 Up 1 Down Report
  10. Top Mathematician
    vyhb

    I don't know why he keeps on hating Shinichi Mochizuki given the fact that he couldn't understand any arithmetric geometry. He reminds me of those Math Education Research maniacs who kept saying "but the studies show blah blah blah." In his case, it was more of like "but Peter Scholze said blah blah blah."

    Woit's blog was instrumental in clarifying the Mochizuki ABC matter. PS follows it and engaged extensively, BC and WS also commented. Nobody else was hosting this type of discussion, and MathOverflow gets the vapors about anything "uncollegial". That was very unsatisfactory as the public record and private opinion in the arithmetic geometry community were quite different. Hence Woit's comment section became the premier outlet for ABC information.

    2 weeks vyhb
    Quote 19 Up 0 Down Report
  11. Top Mathematician
    hoze

    Woit made fun of Mochizuki multiple times afterwards in other blog posts often citing Scholze’s opinions on the subject matter. If he doesn’t know anything about arithmetic geometry he should just shut up. He always pretends to know something but the truth is he doesn’t know shit. He wasted a tenure track opportunity at Columbia which could help other people advance their career and he got that position for having one shitty publication. Now, he is known to be the guy who thinks string theory is not even wrong but the truth is he couldn’t understand string theory either.

    I don't know why he keeps on hating Shinichi Mochizuki given the fact that he couldn't understand any arithmetric geometry. He reminds me of those Math Education Research maniacs who kept saying "but the studies show blah blah blah." In his case, it was more of like "but Peter Scholze said blah blah blah."

    Woit's blog was instrumental in clarifying the Mochizuki ABC matter. PS follows it and engaged extensively, BC and WS also commented. Nobody else was hosting this type of discussion, and MathOverflow gets the vapors about anything "uncollegial". That was very unsatisfactory as the public record and private opinion in the arithmetic geometry community were quite different. Hence Woit's comment section became the premier outlet for ABC information.

    2 weeks hoze
    Quote 5 Up 8 Down Report
  12. Top Mathematician
    hoze

    He and Lex Fridman should be best friend.

    2 weeks hoze
    Quote 1 Up 0 Down Report
  13. Top Mathematician
    mtny

    In clarifying it for you and various other casuals I guess sure. But what does it really matter. So the blog we entertaining to you and a couple peoples houses follow loosely. There really weren’t revelations there which were not known to the people really involved.

    I don't know why he keeps on hating Shinichi Mochizuki given the fact that he couldn't understand any arithmetric geometry. He reminds me of those Math Education Research maniacs who kept saying "but the studies show blah blah blah." In his case, it was more of like "but Peter Scholze said blah blah blah."

    Woit's blog was instrumental in clarifying the Mochizuki ABC matter. PS follows it and engaged extensively, BC and WS also commented. Nobody else was hosting this type of discussion, and MathOverflow gets the vapors about anything "uncollegial". That was very unsatisfactory as the public record and private opinion in the arithmetic geometry community were quite different. Hence Woit's comment section became the premier outlet for ABC information.

    2 weeks mtny
    Quote 1 Up 2 Down Report
  14. Top Mathematician
    vyhb

    Clarifying for the general public, both directly (searches, Wikipedia) and indirectly (updating the people who had published gullible articles on ABC), is the main part of the service performed by Woit's blog on this topic. It may be obvious to people in the field what is going on, but that does not make it any less important. Why do you think Scholze went to the trouble of spending so much time and political capital on this, if it's just a matter of letting things silently sort themselves out among those who know?

    2 weeks vyhb
    Quote 9 Up 0 Down Report
  15. Top Mathematician
    mtny

    Peter spent time reading the work and then pointing out where the proofs don’t seem to work. A couple comments on a blog was not a serious time investment or political expenditure. I get that Woits blog was where some people learned the general situation, but let’s not act like it really moved the ball forward - it had no affect on the situation on the ground in the field tbh.

    2 weeks mtny
    Quote 3 Up 1 Down Report
  16. Top Mathematician
    racb

    Also, there’s nothing Woit did that facilitated that discussion. There was a lot of pent up (at least, non-public) thoughts and feelings around it all. It could have happened on pretty much any blog, it just happened to be that one.

    2 weeks racb
    Quote 1 Up 2 Down Report
  17. Top Mathematician
    eltn

    Woit made fun of Mochizuki multiple times afterwards in other blog posts often citing Scholze’s opinions on the subject matter. If he doesn’t know anything about arithmetic geometry he should just shut up. He always pretends to know something but the truth is he doesn’t know shit. He wasted a tenure track opportunity at Columbia which could help other people advance their career and he got that position for having one shitty publication. Now, he is known to be the guy who thinks string theory is not even wrong but the truth is he couldn’t understand string theory either.

    [...]

    Woit's blog was instrumental in clarifying the Mochizuki ABC matter. PS follows it and engaged extensively, BC and WS also commented. Nobody else was hosting this type of discussion, and MathOverflow gets the vapors about anything "uncollegial". That was very unsatisfactory as the public record and private opinion in the arithmetic geometry community were quite different. Hence Woit's comment section became the premier outlet for ABC information.

    Who understands string theory?

    2 weeks eltn
    Quote 4 Up 0 Down Report
  18. Top Mathematician
    mkfo

    Woit made fun of Mochizuki multiple times afterwards in other blog posts often citing Scholze’s opinions on the subject matter. If he doesn’t know anything about arithmetic geometry he should just shut up. He always pretends to know something but the truth is he doesn’t know shit. He wasted a tenure track opportunity at Columbia which could help other people advance their career and he got that position for having one shitty publication. Now, he is known to be the guy who thinks string theory is not even wrong but the truth is he couldn’t understand string theory either.

    [...]

    Woit's blog was instrumental in clarifying the Mochizuki ABC matter. PS follows it and engaged extensively, BC and WS also commented. Nobody else was hosting this type of discussion, and MathOverflow gets the vapors about anything "uncollegial". That was very unsatisfactory as the public record and private opinion in the arithmetic geometry community were quite different. Hence Woit's comment section became the premier outlet for ABC information.

    Ah, it's the tenure track line nutter again!

    2 weeks mkfo
    Quote 3 Up 0 Down Report
  19. Top Mathematician
    whiy

    Also, there’s nothing Woit did that facilitated that discussion. There was a lot of pent up (at least, non-public) thoughts and feelings around it all. It could have happened on pretty much any blog, it just happened to be that one.

    ^this guy to his peers: There’s nothing special about your Annals paper. It could have been written by pretty much anyone, it just happened to be you.

    2 weeks whiy
    Quote 3 Up 1 Down Report
  20. Top Mathematician
    hoze

    Woit made fun of Mochizuki multiple times afterwards in other blog posts often citing Scholze’s opinions on the subject matter. If he doesn’t know anything about arithmetic geometry he should just shut up. He always pretends to know something but the truth is he doesn’t know shit. He wasted a tenure track opportunity at Columbia which could help other people advance their career and he got that position for having one shitty publication. Now, he is known to be the guy who thinks string theory is not even wrong but the truth is he couldn’t understand string theory either.

    [...]

    Who understands string theory?

    Who understands set theory?

    2 weeks hoze
    Quote 1 Up 1 Down Report
Your screen is so tiny that we decided to disable the captcha and posting feature
Store settings & IDs (locally, encrypted)
New ID for each thread
Click the button below to post


Formatting guidelines: Commonmark with no images and html allowed. $ and $$ for LaTeX. Input previewed in last post of thread. For a link to be allowed it must include the http(s) tag and come from the list of allowed domains.